Legal Opinion

State v. Hsieh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 9, 2021No. A171836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

313 Argued and submitted July 23, affirmed September 9, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARLENE MANLING HSIEH, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 19CR15168; A171836 (Control), A172131, A172345

499 P3d 142

In this consolidated criminal appeal, defendant contests her conviction of first-degree animal neglect. Before trial, defendant moved to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless seizure of her cat. The trial court denied the motion upon determination that the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement applied. On appeal, defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. NewcombOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. EUMANA-MORANCHELOregon Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RibotaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. RibotaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Hsieh v. Oregon Judicial Department District 4 Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API