Legal Opinion
McClendon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 20, 1982No. 63566PublishedCited by 151 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for attempt in which the punishment was assessed at eighteen years confinement.
The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged.
The indictment on which appellant’s conviction is predicated alleged in pertinent part, that he:
“did unlawfully, then and there with the specific intent to commit the offense of aggravated rape, attempt to have sexual intercourse with B— A M — , 1 hereinafter called complainant, a female not his wife, without the consent of the said complainant and did then and there attempt to compel the complainant to submit to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Limuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Church v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Berry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Parkman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Antonio Parra Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
- Ozack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Derek Wryan Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.