Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Jim Dandy Company

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 17, 1970No. 6 Div. 771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

In this case, this court reviews an order of the circuit court, in equity, • denying the respondent’s motion to transfer from equity to law a proceeding which the complainant commenced by filing in the equity court a bill for declaratory decree and supplemental coercive relief.

The bill was filed by I. H. Sugerman, a natural person, who will be referred to as the complainant. The bill is filed against a corporation formerly named Western Grain Company and now named The Jim Dandy Company. The corporation will be referred to as the respondent.

The respondent filed its motion to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Glass v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Tuscaloosa County v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harper v. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Miller v. HolderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. City of Dothan v. Eighty-Four West, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Lorch, Inc. v. Bessemer Mall Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Ellis v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API