Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1998No. 49A02-9704-PC-251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-Defendant Karl Haynes (“Haynes”) appeals the post-conviction court’s denial of his Petition for Post-conviction Relief challenging his convictions for Murder and Conspiracy to Commit Murder. 1 We affirm.

Issue

Haynes raises four issues on appeal which we consolidate and restate as whether Haynes was denied fundamental due process as a result of the conduct of his trial and appellate counsel.

Facts

The facts, as set forth by our supreme court in Haynes’ direct appeal, are as follows:

During the afternoon of August 1, 1983, Co-defendant Carl Isom and two…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Weatherford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Games v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Badelle v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Sims v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Landis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API