Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph E. Hornick

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 14, 1987No. 86-2839PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Caught at the airport with more than 250 grams of cocaine in his boots, Joseph Hor-nick entered a conditional guilty plea to a charge of possession with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, to be followed by three years’ special parole. The “condition” on the plea was that Homick be allowed to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the cocaine. Magistrate James Groh recommended that the district judge deny the motion; she did. The magistrate’s report is a thoughtful and thorough treatment of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Jesus Zambrana, Sr., Charles Cole and Jay ZambranaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Joseph R. KollerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Loren Samuel WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Rosenthal & Company, a Partnership, and Fgl Commodity Services, Inc., an Iowa Corporation v. Rothwell Cotton Company, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API