Alfred v. Lee

AYRES, Judge.

Plaintiff filed this suit against the defendant for damages to his automobile in the *602sum of $608.93, resulting from a collision with a mule owned by the defendant, who allegedly permitted the animal to roam at large, in violation of an ordinance of the Caddo Parish Police Jury.

Defendant denied any negligence on his part and especially that he had permitted any of his stock to roam at large, and alleged that the mule breaking out of the pasture was purely an accident. He further contended that plaintiff's son, the driver, was operating plaintiff’s automobile in a careless and…