Brandy v. City of Cedar Hill
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Justice.
Lydia Brandy contends that the trial court erred in granting the City’s motion for summary judgment because the City did not prove as a matter of law that she received the due process to which she was entitled in connection with her termination from employment by the City.
Brandy was employed by the City of Cedar Hill as a secretary at its police department. She was fired on May 16, 1989. The employee handbook promulgated by the City provided that no employee would be terminated without cause and also provided for a post-termination appeal. It further stated that all…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dale Schaper v. City of Huntsville, Gene Pipes and Hank EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baker v. Gregg County, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Tarrant County v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Dallas County Civil Service Commission v. Warren, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Tarrant Appraisal District v. Gateway Center Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Tarrant County v. Steven Van Sickle, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.