Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Vasquez

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 1999No. 2-98-0680Published

1DissentJustice Rapr

I dissent from the majority’s holding regarding strict application of the 90-day limitation of section 122 — 2.1(a) of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (the Act) (725 ILCS 5/122—2.1(a) (West 1998)) in the context of an appeal of the dismissal of a petition as untimely. The filing of a notice of appeal deprives a trial court of jurisdiction over substantive matters within the scope of the subject of the appeal. In re A.P., 285 Ill. App. 3d 897, 901 (1997). When the trial court in our case dismissed defendant’s pro se postconviction petition as being untimely and defendant timely appealed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. DouglasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. People v. A.P.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API