Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1988No. D.D. No. 87-23PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules and hereby adopts the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock, No. 9-87-BOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HockOhio Supreme Court · 1990