Legal Opinion

Calabrese v. Adelman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 11, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This is a broker’s suit for commissions claimed to be earned in the procurement of a purchaser for real estate. The only-ground of appeal that is properly raised, and indeed the only ground that is argued, is that the court erred in refusing to nonsuit.

There was no written authority for the broker, but it developed in the ease that the defendant was not in fact the owner of the property, but that it belonged to his mother; and, hence, the trial judge properly held that the case was not within the tenth section of the statute of frauds. Sadler v. Young, 78 N. J. L. 594; Feist v.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. HeatonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Potts v. ThompsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Blitzer v. BurnsUnited States District Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API