Legal Opinion

United States v. James

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided August 14, 1973No. Crim. A. 4384-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

NIXON, District Judge.

The defendants have filed a Joint Motion to Suppress for Use as Evidence all property seized by law enforcement officers from 1148 Lewis Street and 1320 Lynch Street, Jackson, Mississippi and to require the return thereof pursuant to Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., and to suppress all statements or answers given by the defendants. A full evidentiary hearing was held on this motion, and based upon all of the evidence adduced, this Court has reached its following findings and conclusions.

On the late evening of August 13,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Republic of New Afrika v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API