Legal Opinion
Mori v. Port Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 24, 1984No. 82 Civ. 5669(CES)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Plaintiff Stephen Mori (“Mori”) brings this motion seeking to file a jury demand nunc pro tunc pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 39(b) and 81(c). Defendants Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port Authority”) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”) oppose the motion on the basis of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d), the federal removal statute for foreign states, timeliness and convenience.
Mori originally filed this action against KLM and Port Authority in New York County Supreme Court on July 2,1982 for personal injuries allegedly sustained while performing his work…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Ramiro Arango and Gabriella Arango, Individually, Etc., Plaintiffs v. Guzman Travel Advisors Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Higgins v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Lisette Cascone v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Teledyne, Inc., Teledyne Canada Limited, and Teledyne Cm Products, Inc. v. Kone Corporation, Outokumpu Oy and Rammer Oy, Finnish CorporationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tucker v. Whitaker Travel, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Nolan ex rel. Estate of Johnson v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Adolph Coors Co. v. SicklerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1985
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Insurance Corp. of Ireland, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.