Legal Opinion

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Carver

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1951No. 6 Div. 166Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

FOSTER, Justice.

Our attention has been called to a failure on our part to respond to the conten*476tion made by appellee that the motion for a new trial was properly granted by the court by reason of certain remarks made by appellant’s counsel on the trial of the case. The first of those contentions is thus stated in the record:

“Mr. Cole: Whether there be a discount to his insurance company or not, the car was repaired, and is repaired. I don’t know what the facts are behind it as to arrangements one way'or the other.
“Mr. Emond: We object to that, if the court please.
“The Court: What…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Standridge v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sullivan Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Smith v. BaggettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API