Bullion, Beck & Champion Mining Co. v. Eureka Hill Mining Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of tbe first district adjudging certain agents of defendant guilty of contempt. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Boreman, J.:
Tbe appellant company, and Jobn Beck, its superintendent, and H. H. Day, its-manager, were by tbe district court adjudged guilty of “contempt of court, as charged,” upon a charge of violating an injunction' contained in tbe judgment in favor of respondent company, on tbe cross-complaint filed in tbe principal case, and a fine was imposed upon each. Tbe parties adjudged to be in contempt have appealed to this court.
Tbe injunction clause referred to, and under which tbe contempt proceedings were instituted, is as follows: “And it is further adjudged that tbe plaintiff company, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- BUTCHERS'BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing and Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Sixth Avenue R.R. Co. v. . Gilbert E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Heinlen v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- State ex rel. Matthews v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Gibson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex parte WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1894
- Alfred v. AlfredSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.