Legal Opinion

City of Red Bank-White Oak v. Abercrombie

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peewitt

The complainants compose the Board of Election Commissioners of Hamilton County, and as such sued the City of Red Bank and White Oak and Hamilton County under the declaratory judgment law, seeking to have the Court declare whether the City of Red Bank - White Oak or Hamilton County is liable for the costs and expenses incurred in holding a municipal referendum. Complainants insist that the municipality is liable, while the muni*702cipality insists that tlie-eonnt-y-is liable. The Chancellor upheld the bill as aHd©felfif:MÍ®r^)Jíiidgment bill and was of the opinion that the~-expens'es~should be…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Abercrombie v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API