Legal Opinion

Pohl v. Gilbert

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1979No. Docket 78-873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P.J.

Plaintiff brought suit under the no-fault automobile insurance act alleging that defendant’s negligent operation of an automobile in which plaintiff was a passenger had caused plaintiff serious impairment of body function. See MCL 500.3135(1); MSA 24.13135(1). A bench trial was held, at the conclusion of which the trial court found negligence, but no serious impairment of body function. Plaintiff appeals and we reverse.

Plaintiffs primary contention on appeal is that *179the trial court erred in finding no serious impairment of body function.

Findings of fact by the trial court may not be set aside…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Reed v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hermann v. HaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Rigoni v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Burk v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Stinebaugh v. BristolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API