Sage v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Grant Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The appellant was indicted and convicted as an accessory before the fact to the crime of murder.
The question for consideration is as to the sufficiency of the indictment after verdict to sustain a judgment as against a motion in arrest.
Concerning accessories we find the following in the code of criminal procedure : “ Whenever the person accused is to be charged as an accessory before the fact, the following (or words of similar import) shall be inserted after the statement of the offence committed by theprincipal: 'And the said A. B. was accessory before the fact to the said felony’ (here set…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ulmer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Shepherd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Nave v. NaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Mansur v. StreightIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Burroughs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Madison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Sage v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Harter v. ParsonsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Village of Ashley v. Ashley Lumber Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.