Legal Opinion

American Samoa Government v. Sanerivi

High Court of American Samoa

Decided June 10, 2003No. CR No. 06-03; CR No. 07-03Published

1Opinion of the Court

*115ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PUBLIC FUNDS TO INVESTIGATE WITNESSES

Defendants bring this motion for funding to interview witnesses in (Independent) Samoa. Defendants have been declared indigent and have been appointed public counsel. Their motion, therefore, falls under the ambit of AM. SAMOA Rev. Const, art. 1 § 6, which provides every defendant with the right to have the effective assistance of counsel. See generally Suisala v. Moaali'itele, 6 A.S.R.2d 15 (1987) (incorporating Federal effective assistance of counsel standard); A.S.C.A. §§ 46.0502 and 46.1001.

The effective assistance of counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Charles Anthony HartfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Robert Theodore BassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API