Legal Opinion

Sullins v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from Circuit Court of Macon. Tried before Hon. James E. Cobb. The appellant was indicted under the act of February 20th, 1875, for stealing part of an outstanding crop of corn. The evidence showed that he had pulled eight or ten

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

Before the confessions of the accused, or admissions made by him, can be received as evidence against him, it must appear to the court that they were voluntary, not constrained. Though made to the officer arresting him, or to the magistrate before whom he is carried for examination; or made in answer to inquiries propounded by either officer; and though neither has cautioned or warned him against confessing ; if, on a consideration of all the circumstances surrounding him when made, they do not seem to have been influenced by the appliances of hope or fear, from others, they are competent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  2. Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Seaborn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Goldin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Newsom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Henly v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API