Eichleay, Jr., Co. v. Antonoplos
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This bill desires cancellation of plaintiffs’ collateral note for $140,000, and the return of the collateral, on the ground that the principal, $110,000, with lawful interest, has been paid, and that the balance is “a bonus, premium or extra interest charge payable to the defendant, for the use of the said money,” which defendant is not entitled to collect: Act of April 28, 1858, P. L. 622, 41 PS, sections 3 and 4. The answer denied usury; alleged that the note represented not only a balance of principal of $110,000, but (1) unpaid interest on this and prior notes;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Commonwealth v. DuffySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Schenley v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Hepburn v. CurtsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houghten v. Restland Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Gerber's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939