Legal Opinion
Huynh v. Sutter Health
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 14, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01757Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANH BAO VY HUYNH, No. 2:20-cv-01757-MCE-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 SUTTER HEALTH; SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER 15 FOUNDATION; NATHAN HALE ALLEN, M.D.; and DOES 1-50, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiff Anh Bao Vy Huynh (“Plaintiff”) asserts 20 various causes of action against Defendants Sutter Health, Sutter Roseville Medical 21 Center Foundation, and Nathan Hale Allen, M.D. (collectively “Defendants” unless 22 otherwise noted) for personal injuries…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.