Legal Opinion

Confluence Borough School District v. Ursina Borough School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1926No. Appeal 185Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

Prior to 1915, Paul Nagle and Ms parents resided in' Ursina Borough. When the family removed, to Youngwood, Paul remained with Mayme Zimmerman, an aunt, who was a resident of said borough. He entered the public schools of Ursina Borough School District and completed the course of the elementary schools.

The school district not having a Mgh school, Paul procured the consent of the directors of the Confluence Borough School District to attend the high school in said district wMch was the nearest and most convenient high school to Ursina Borough. He went there for four years…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School District of Borough v. School DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Fry v. Directors of Upper Swatara Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Black v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API