State ex rel. Hugg v. Ivins

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

The relator was appointed solicitor of the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Camden for the year 1894, by the board of that year.

At the time of the election of the relator, the members of the board were clearly usurpers of the positions which they *140■then held. The Supreme Court at the November Term, 1894, in the ease of Davis v. Davis, 28 Vroom 203, on information in the nature of quo warranto, determined that the members of the board were usurpers in office, and not entitled to the positions they held, and not entitled to the…