Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1954No. 12034PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from denial by the district court of appellant’s informal petition for writ of habeas corpus. The issue raised by him is that, upon his guilty plea to the four counts of an indictment for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 10, 2311-2313, the district judge sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment on each count of the indictment to run concurrently but suspended the sentence on all four counts and that, therefore, no imprisonment being imposed upon him unless he violated such suspended sentence, he should have been discharged on habeas corpus.

Upon the facts found in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Fox v. PriceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Pitisci v. HardwickDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API