State v. Young
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. W. I. Babb, Judge. The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of nuisance, and, Ms motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial being overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, from wMeh the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.
The record, after showing the indictment, is as follows:
“Defendant, having been properly arraigned on the seventeenth day of the term, in person entered his plea of not guilty; and thereafter, on the twenty-second day of this' term, being the twenty-seventh day of November, 1891, this case was regularly called for trial. The defendant failing to appear in person when the case was called for trial, W. "W. Cory, Esq., who had previously appeared as attorney for the defendant, withdrew his appearance before the jury were called or impaneled, and thereupon the court, in the absence of the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- State v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Gray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Stuart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911