Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Lombard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1960No. 1695PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

As holders of certain first mortgages, the plaintiffs, Hugh H. Harrell and Margaret Harrell, his wife, sought to foreclose them against parcels of land owned by Daniel Lombard, a defendant, upon which lands second mortgages were held by Ernest Fuld and Rosalyn Fuld, his wife, Ben H. Barbour, Jr. and Mildred D. Barbour, and Joseph Sassano, also defendants. The chancellor declined to grant a decree of foreclosure, and because of this, the appeal has ensued.

At the time of the institution of the foreclosure suit, the first mortgages were in default; and notice of acceleration had been given to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WernerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Koschorek v. FischerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Flagler Ctr. Bldg Loan Corp. v. Chem Realty Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Dagnino v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Pearson v. ArthurDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API