Legal Opinion

Long v. Rodman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, sued the appellees, as defendants, in the court below, on an open account, for services alleged to have been rendered by the appellants, as attorneys at law, for and at the request of the appellees. ■

The complaint was in the Ordinary form in such cases, and the bill of particulars, therewith filed, charged the appellees with the services of the appellants, as such attorneys, .in and about a certain suit in the court below, wherein the appellees, as administrators of the estate of Thomas J. Rodman, deceased, were plaintiffs, and the personal representatives and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willcox v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Nave v. SalmonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gow v. MauryMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Matson v. PearsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Nichols v. ReyburnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Holderbaugh v. TurpinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Bogue v. SachsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API