Legal Opinion

United States v. 1308 Selby Lane

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2017No. Case 15-6353UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

Knox County, Tennessee (“Knox County”) claims that the United States Attor*547ney denied it, as a local taxing authority, due process in a forfeiture proceeding involving real property located at 1308 Selby Lane and 1525 Wembley Hill Road, Knoxville, Tennessee (collectively, the “Defendant Property”). Based on that premise, Knox County filed a motion for relief from judgement and to determine the validity and extent of tax liens it held on the Defendant property. The district court denied the motion finding the forfeiture proceeding was valid. Knox…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jonathan Moses v. City of Perry, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  2. Dates v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. IOU Central Inc. v. Total Plant Management Group Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  4. McKinney v. MendozaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  5. Tony Vitrano Company v. Lanasa Produce, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API