Legal Opinion
Cittadino v. DeGironimo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant Louis DeGironimo, doing business as Yesterday’s, for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s causes of action asserted against Yesterday’s under General Obligations Law § 11-100 (1) and § 11-101 (1). Yesterday’s established that it did not sell, furnish or assist in procuring any alcoholic beverages to or for codefendant Marie Pugliese (Pugliese) and that Pugliese was not intoxicated on the evening of the alleged…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sherman v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bartkowiak v. St. Adalbert's Roman Catholic Church SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Silver v. Sheraton-Smithtown InnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jayes v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Panzera v. Johnny's IIAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Williams v. TeDave Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Boyea v. AubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wilder v. Nickbert Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.