Legal Opinion

In re City of Buffalo

Superior Court of Buffalo

Decided June 1, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by the corporation counsel of the city of Buffalo to confirm a report-of commissioners fixing compensation to be paid by the city for taking the fee of land within the boundaries of The Terrace and Washington streets, in that city. See 15 N. Y. Supp. 123.

1Opinion of the CourtBeckwith, J.

This is a proceeding instituted by the city to take the fee of the lands within the boundaries of the street called “The Terrace” and a portion of Washington street. The commissioners heretofore appointed “toascertain and report the just compensation to he made to the owners” of the *776lands to be taken have filed their report. The corporation counsel now moves the confirmation of the report, which is opposed by lot-owners. Mr. Locke, of counsel for Mr. Pratt, who is the owner of premises fronting 215 feet on The Terrace, opposes the confirmation upon the ground, among other objections, that a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. . the New-York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Craig v. . Rochester City Brighton R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Fobes v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Nash v. . White's Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hymes v. . EstyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Mattlage v. New York El. R.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API