Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 616A86PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The questions presented by this appeal are whether the hearing courts erred when they denied defendant’s pre-trial motions for the appointment of a psychiatrist and fingerprint expert to assist in the preparation and presentation of his defense. We hold that the hearing courts erred with regard to both motions and order a new trial on this account.

I

On 7 January 1986, the Gaston County grand jury returned indictments charging defendant with first degree sexual offense, first degree burglary, and assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury. All…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. George Franklin Page v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API