Legal Opinion
City of Lewiston v. Bergamo
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 10, 1990No. 17970PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WINMILL, Judge Pro Tem.
This is an appeal from a decision of the district court concerning the validity and effect of the City of Lewiston’s annexation and zoning of previously unincorporated lands owned by the defendants, Robert and Elizabeth Bergamo. Specifically, the Bergamos challenge a decision of the district court upholding the validity of the ordinance by which the City annexed their property. The Bergamos also argue that the district court erred in concluding that a municipality is not a “person” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissing their claim for damages under that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stucker v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994