Legal Opinion

Federal v. Ortiz

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided April 14, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard Sherman, J.

Respondent moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)' (2) to dismiss this proceeding for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the grounds that the notice of intention of nonrenewal fails to conform with the requireihents of Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR) § 2524.2, and on the further ground that the petition and notice of petition fail to refer to, incorporate, or contain a copy of the notice of intention of nonrenewal.

Petitioner brought this holdover proceeding, seeking to recover the subject premises on the grounds of owner’s own use. Petitioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rose Associates v. BernsteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Katz Park Avenue Corp. v. OldenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
  2. Beohm v. Pickel (In re Pickel)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  3. Cosmopolitan Broadcasting Corp. v. MirandaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
  4. Park Lake Residences, LP v. PattersonNassau County District Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API