Legal Opinion

State v. Brodock

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1917No. 3,999PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Meagher County; John A. Matthews, Judge. William D. Brodock was convicted of larceny, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying Mm a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

The defendant, convicted of the crime of larceny of certain steers and heifers (grand larceny), has appealed from the judg*464ment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. It is contended that the trial court committed prejudicial error in admitting one item of evidence, in submitting a paragraph of its charge to the jury, and in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. The record presents no substantial basis for any of the contentions made.

[1] 1. The defendant was charged jointly with one Ducolon, but was awarded a…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HallawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. KreggerMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. HarkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. FrancisMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. SawyerMontana Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API