Legal Opinion

Champion v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1918No. 9265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Indictment for seduction; from Gordon superior court — Judge Tarver. September 29, 191'?’

1Opinion of the CourtHarwell, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of the offense of seduction, his motion for a new trial was overruled, and he excepted. Three of the grounds of the motion are based upon newly discovered evidence, by which it is sought to attack the chastity of the prosecutrix and to show that she was not a virtuous female. This newly discovered evidence is set out in the affidavits of three witnesses, Bowen, Taylor and Tearwood. There are supporting affidavits as to their credibility, and affidavits of the defendant and his counsel showing diligence and want of knowledge of this testimony before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fouraker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Hatcher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Potter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Amusements of America v. SchatzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Crumley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Trentham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API