Conley v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Phelps county. Tried below before Beall, J. People v. Allen, 5 Den. [N. Y.], 76; Stoker v. People, 114 Ill., 320; State v. Denton, 22 Atl. Rep. [Md.], 305; Doyle v. Alderman of Raleigh, 45 Am. Rep. [N. Car.], 677; Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N. Car., 199; Eliason v. Coleman, 86 N. Car., 235; State v. Stanley, 8 Am.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Phelps county. Tried below before Beall, J. People v. Allen, 5 Den. [N. Y.], 76; Stoker v. People, 114 Ill., 320; State v. Denton, 22 Atl. Rep. [Md.], 305; Doyle v. Alderman of Raleigh, 45 Am. Rep. [N. Car.], 677; Worthy v. Barrett, 63 N. Car., 199; Eliason v. Coleman, 86 N. Car., 235; State v. Stanley, 8 Am. Rep. [N. Car.], 488; Walker v. City of Cincinnati, 21 O. St., 14; Braithwaite v. State, 28 Neb., 835; Burke v. State, 34 O. St., 79; Lightner v. Steinagel, 33 Ill., 513; Reg. v. Gibbs, Dears [Eng.], 445; State v. Foster, 11 Ia., 291; Rex v. Mason, Dowl. &…
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of embezzlement in the district court of Phelps county. There were three counts in the information, but as the verdict of guilty referred *189only to the offense described in the last count, this alone need be considered. In.this count it was charged that Douglas S. Conley, at all times referred to, was the sheriff of the aforesaid county; that said office of sheriff was one of public trust; that said Conley on August 16, 1893, as sheriff, made and conducted a sale of the northwest quarter of section 30, in town 5 north, of range 19 west, 6th P. M.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bradford v. Justices of Inferior CourtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
- Hill v. BoylandMississippi Supreme Court · 1866
- Stoker v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- John S. v. TingleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- State ex rel. Elliott v. HollidayNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- Branch v. Central Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Gibson v. MonahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Opinion No. (1984), Missouri Attorney General Reports1984