Legal Opinion

Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 1977No. 30524, CA 7243PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

The issue in this workmen’s compensation case is whether claimant’s reliance upon her attorney to file a timely request for a hearing following denial of her compensation claim constitutes good cause, under ORS 656.319,1 for delay in filing that request.

The State Accident Insurance Fund notified claimant on June 25, 1974, that her claim was denied and advised her that she could request a hearing but that failure to do so within 60 days would foreclose her right to object to the denial. Claimant read the notice of her hearing rights. Within four days thereafter she consulted an attorney and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fulop v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Brooks v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hood River County v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API