Legal Opinion
Geisey v. Holberg
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 7, 1946No. [Nos. 63-65, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.
Frances B. Geisey and James M. Geisey were married on August 3,1943. Each had been married before. Mrs. Geisey had a minor son from her former marriage. On September 30, 1943, Mr. Geisey purchased for $12,000 No. 103 West Twenty-ninth Street, in fee simple, paying $4,000 in cash and giving an $8,000 mortgage to George J. Zaiser, George R. Zaiser and Roland D. Zaiser, trustees under the will of Louis F. Zaiser. The title to the property was taken in the name of Mr. and Mrs. Geisey as tenants by the entireties, and the Zaiser mortgage was executed by both of them. Some difficulties arose…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Bachrach v. Washington United Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Albert v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Swift v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- National Union Bank v. Miller Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- McClung-Logan Equipment Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Southern Maryland Oil, Inc. v. KaminetzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Vinogradova v. Suntrust Bank, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Chertkof v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.