Legal Opinion

Holler v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided January 7, 1944No. 12102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a motion asking the court to “apply the consequences provided by Rule 37”, and as grounds therefor, alleges defendant’s failure and refusal to comply with certain orders heretofore made by the court respecting the answers to interrogatories propounded to the defendant under Rule 33, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

This is the third time the question respecting such answers has been before the court, and the third judge before whom the matter has been argued. The first time the question was before the court was on…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. 42 JARS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
  2. Mowry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Segarra v. Waterman Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966
  4. Ohio Realty Investment Co. v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. of RichmondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Chatman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API