Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Frankfurter
My brother Jackson has analyzed with particularity the economic and social aspects of natural gas as well as *625the difficulties which led to the enactment of the Natural Gas Act, especially those arising out of the abortive attempts of States to regulate natural gas utilities. The Natural Gas Act of 1938 should receive application in the light of this analysis, and Mr. Justice Jackson has, I believe, drawn relevant inferences regarding the duty of the Federal Power Commission in fixing natural gas rates. His exposition seems to me unanswered, and I shall say only a few words to emphasize my…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.