Legal Opinion
Salitan v. Magnus
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 6, 1958PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pboctok, J.
The Law Division of the Superior Court denied the defendants’ motion for an order permitting them to file a third-party complaint. The Appellate Division affirmed. 48 N. J. Super. 168 (App. Div. 1957). We granted defendants’ petition for certification. 26 N. J. 303 (1958).
On January 26, 1956 Samuel S. Salitan et al., trading as Credit Industrial Company, a partnership, instituted an action in the Law Division of the Superior Court against the defendants, Finn H. Magnus and Elsie A. Magnus, his wife, as guarantors for certain secured debts of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Magnus Harmonica CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
3Cited by22 opinions
- Marley v. Palmyra Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- FRANKLIN MED. v. Newark Public Sch.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Looman Realty Corp. v. BROAD ST. NAT. BK., TRENTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Salitan v. MagnusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Scott v. GarberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.