Legal Opinion

Warr v. Horsley

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 8, 1989No. Civ. A. 87-D-1012-NPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DUBINA, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue before the court is whether Title XIX of the Social Security Act of 1965, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder require the Alabama Medicaid program to cover services provided by podiatrists where those services are covered when provided by physicians.

The plaintiffs maintain that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 1396a(a)(23), sometimes referred to as the “freedom of choice provision,” they are entitled to reimbursement for treatment by podiatrists to the same ’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. District of Columbia Podiatry Society v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  3. Sandefur v. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. State Licensing Board for Healing Arts v. Alabama Board of PodiatrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King Ex Rel. King v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
  2. Gary Dube & a. v. New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  3. William T. Ex Rel. Gigi T. v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API