Legal Opinion

Limbach v. Schmalz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

One under contract to render services must look to his employer for compensation unless in a proper case he has availed himself of the auxiliary remedy of a laborer’s or mechanic’s lien, secured a valid written promise of another to pay the employer’s debt, or a novation has been made and a new debtor substituted. It appears from the evidence that respondent and his co-laborer Wick were uneasy because of their employer’s (Schreck’s) failure to pay them their wages due on this and other jobs. Respondent testified: “My testimony now is that I told Schmalz that I had some money coming from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank of Appleton v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Breuer v. ArenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Bank of Eastman v. RawsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Iowa County Bank v. GraberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Utschig v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Superior Plumbing Co. v. TefsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API