Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ray v. Blease

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 8, 1913No. 8644PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Petition by W. W. Ray ex rel. the State for injunction against the Sinking Fund Commission. cite: Resolution of Sinking Rund Commission parsed by less than a quorum is not valid: Sedg. Con. L. 38?; 11 S. C. 343; 88 S. C. 521; 52 S. C. 60; 86 S. W. 819; 21 Barb. 500; 22 Barb. 137, 400; 46 N. Y. 375; 49 Pac. 89; 31 Miss. 525; 9 Ark. 300; Mech. Pub. Off., secs. 572-3; 52 N. Y. 478; 74 S. E. 506; Harp. 139; 144 U. S. 1; 4 Tenn.

Read the full summary

Petition by W. W. Ray ex rel. the State for injunction against the Sinking Fund Commission. cite: Resolution of Sinking Rund Commission parsed by less than a quorum is not valid: Sedg. Con. L. 38?; 11 S. C. 343; 88 S. C. 521; 52 S. C. 60; 86 S. W. 819; 21 Barb. 500; 22 Barb. 137, 400; 46 N. Y. 375; 49 Pac. 89; 31 Miss. 525; 9 Ark. 300; Mech. Pub. Off., secs. 572-3; 52 N. Y. 478; 74 S. E. 506; Harp. 139; 144 U. S. 1; 4 Tenn. Rep. 810; 6 Ibid. 268; 4 East. 17; 1 B. & C. 492, 609; 9 B. & C. 851; Cushing E. & P. of Leg. Ass., sec. 261; 1 Pearson 118; 12 Ela. 653; 5 DavisAbridg. 150; 4 Abb. N.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mu. Justice ITydrick.

At the session of 1913, the legislature passed an act entitled, “Am act to provide for the exercise by the State of its option, to' call in and pay the whole or any part of the Brown Bonds and Stocks, issued under an act entitled ‘An act to provide for the redemption of that portion of the State debt known as the Brown Con-sol Bonds and Stocks, by the issue of other bonds and stocks,’ approved December 33, A. D. 1893.” 37 Stat. 738. The act provides that the Sinking Fund Commission, which is composed of the Governor, the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. O'DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  2. Robertson v. TillmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  3. Ehrlich v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. State v. PotterfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Elliott v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Textured Fibres, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  5. Gasque, Inc. v. NatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API