Legal Opinion
Plant v. Shalit
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In April 1970 the then seven-year-old plaintiff Kimberly Plant and her parents consulted the defendant Shimon Shalit, a urologist, for treatment of, and possible surgery for, Kimberly’s recurrent urinary tract infections. The plaintiffs were referred to the defendant by Kimberly’s pediatricians who expressed concern that future infections could result in kidney damage. After considering the child’s medical history and performing a physical examination, Dr. Shalit advised Kimberly’s parents of his initial impression that their daughter was suffering from meatal stenosis, which would, in all…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Zeleznik v. Jewish Chronic Disease HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Norfleet v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Gonzalez v. MoscarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landau v. RappaportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mendoza v.KaplowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Widman v. HorwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kaplan v. NadlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Sauer v. AgueroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000