Legal Opinion

Houts v. Fritz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 32,628Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This appeal involves the correctness of the allowance of a claim against a decedent’s estate.

It appears that in the probate court the claim of C. B. Fritz, undertaker, was allowed in the sum of $235, on which $115 .had been paid. On final settlement, the administratrix was directed to pay the balance of $120. The administratrix appealed to the district court, her notice of appeal stating that she appealed from the order made on final settlement disallowing her claim for moneys expended for the care and feed of livestock and for harvesting…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keith v. Martin-Fleming Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API