Houts v. Fritz
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This appeal involves the correctness of the allowance of a claim against a decedent’s estate.
It appears that in the probate court the claim of C. B. Fritz, undertaker, was allowed in the sum of $235, on which $115 .had been paid. On final settlement, the administratrix was directed to pay the balance of $120. The administratrix appealed to the district court, her notice of appeal stating that she appealed from the order made on final settlement disallowing her claim for moneys expended for the care and feed of livestock and for harvesting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Keith v. Martin-Fleming Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928