Legal Opinion

Henze v. Rogatzky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1917No. Docket No. 129Published

Appeal from Wayne; Lamb, J., presiding. Bill by William E. Henze, administrator of the estate of Richard Rogatzky, against Mathilda Rogatzky to set aside a deed. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Gustav Rogatzky presented his claim against his deceased brother’s estate to the commissioners and it was allowed at the sum of $3,920.01. There being no available assets in the estate to satisfy *559the same the administrator filed this bill to set aside a conveyance of real estate which deceased made to defendant, his wife, the day of his death. The real estate in question consists of two lots situate on Michigan avenue between Fifteenth and Sixteenth streets, in the city of Detroit. The lots, with the improvements thereon, are said to be worth the sum of $15,000, with an incumbrance of $2,700.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Michigan Trust Co. v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Ball v. PhenicieMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Case Manufacturing Co. v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Blue v. SchurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API