Legal Opinion

Fire District No. 1 v. Graniteville Spring Water Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 5, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

This is a controversy between two corporations engaged in the business of merchandising water. The plaintiff supplies the village of East Barre. Its reservoir is fed by a brook made by the union of several small streams, one of which is the so-called McAulay brook, whose headwaters are on the farm of Annie McAulay, in the town of Williamstown. The defendant supplies customers in the towns of Barre and Williamstown, and elsewhere.

In 1927, Annie McAulay conveyed to the defendant all springs and water rights on said farm, except two certain springs — one known as the McAulay spring and the other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  2. Wilson v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Clark v. Estate of ConroeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  4. Harwood v. Benton & JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  5. Stoddard v. Van BussumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. City of Winooski v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  3. Appeal of ParkerVermont Superior Court · 2005
  4. Logue v. RichmondVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API