Ansonia Brass Co. v. Conner
New York Court of Common Pleas
1Dissent
Daly, C. J. (dissenting).
— The interlocutory judgment is reviewahle upon this appeal. The provision in the new Code (seo. 1301) that if the appellant upon an appeal from a final judgment, intends to bring up for review thereupon an interlocutory judgment or intermediate order, he must in his notice of appeal specify the interlocutory judgment or order to be *276reviewed, does not apply to this case. The portion of the new Code of which this provision is a part, did not go into effect until the 1st of September, 1880; and the appeal to this court was brought before that, on the 19th of May, 1880,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Schaick v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Putnam v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Cunningham v. BucklinNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Wheeler v. LampmanNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Merritt v. SeamanNew York Supreme Court · 1849
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.