Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1975No. 308Published

1DissentPomeroy, Justice

Section 402 of the Unemployment Compensation Act provides in part that “[a]n employee shall be ineligible for compensation for any week ... in which his unemployment is due to failure, without good cause . to accept suitable work when offered to him by the employment office of or by any employer . . . ’b1 *401The Court today decides that appellant was improperly denied unemployment compensation benefits because “there was ‘good cause’ for [him] to reject the proffered employment under the conditions imposed”. Opinion of the Court, ante at 598. I respectfully dissent.

Preliminarily, I must note…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Spence v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API